Working for full equality for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender people of Wisconsin
Contact Us | Home
Constitutional Ban Details What you can do Who we are
What is this ban?
How could it harm us (legally)?
What have other states done?
Personal examples
Home > Ban Details >
What other states have done
Wording used by other states ranges from simply restanding the "Defense of Marriage Act" to the extreme of dissolving (formerly) legally binding contracts between people of the same gender (such as power of Attorney, trusts, etc.). Most are now using wording that removes any opportunity for recognition of Domestic Partnerships and civil unions.

Below is a listing 17 other states and the wording used in their passed amendments.

State Wording
Alaska The amendment is short and defines marriages to be recognized as valid as "only between one man and one woman. The amendment does not address other arrangements similar to marriage.
Arkansas CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT NO. 3 (Ballot text)
A proposed amendment to the Arkansas Constitution providing that marriage consists only of the union of one man and one woman; that legal status for unmarried persons which is identical or substantially similar to marital status shall not be valid or recognized in Arkansas, except that the Legislature may recognize a common law marriage from another state between a man and a woman; and that the Legislature has the power to determine the capacity of persons to marry, subject to this amendment, and the legal rights, obligations, privileges, and immunities of marriage.
Hawaii The amendment gives the State Legislature the power to "reserve marriage to opposite-sex couples," but does not have any language concerning arrangements which are similar to marriage. Court Decisions: Bachar v. Miike (1999) rendered previous decision finding that current law prohibiting same sex marriage violated rights moot under legislative amendment.
Georgia "(a) This state shall recognize as marriage only the union of man and woman.Marriages between persons of the same sex are prohibited in this state.

(b) No union between persons of the same sex shall be recognized by this state as entitled to the benefits of marriage. This state shall not give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other state or jurisdiction respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other state or jurisdiction. The courts of this state shall have no jurisdiction to grant a divorce or separate maintenance with respect to any such relationship or otherwise to consider or rule on any of the parties respective rights arising as a result of or in connection with such relationship."
Kentucky (Ballot Text) Are you in favor of amending the Kentucky Constitution to provide that only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be a marriage in Kentucky, and that a legal status identical to or similar to marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized?"
Michigan With the adoption of Proposal 2, the constitution will now define the union between a man and a woman in legal marriage as the only agreement recognized as a marriage or similar union for any purpose.
Mississippi "This proposed constitutional amendment provides that marriage may take place and may be valid under the laws of this state only between a man and a woman. The amendment also provides that a marriage in another state or foreign jurisdiction between persons of the same gender may not be recognized in this state and is void and unenforceable under the laws of the state."
Missouri The amendment was approved by voters on August 3, 2004, and defines marriage in Missouri as "a union between one man and one woman." The amendment does not address other arrangements similar to marriage.
Montana "Only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state." That's the complete text of the change Constitutional Initiative 96 proposes to Article XIII of the Montana Constitution. The wording seems simple and reiterates Montana law that's already in force. CI-96 isn't necessary. Montana law already stipulates that marriage in this state is a union of one man and one woman. Amending the constitution wouldn't change that.
Nebraska The amendment states "only marriage between a man and a woman shall be valid or recognized in Nebraska." The amendment also addresses civil unions, domestic partnerships or other same sex relationships and states that these arrangements between same sex couples are not valid or recognized.
Nevada The amendment states that "only marriage between a male and a female person shall be recognized." The amendment does not provide information about arrangements similar to marriage.
North Dakota Measure 1, which would prohibit same-sex marriage, civil unions and other legal protections for gay and lesbian couples in the state, appeared on the ballots Tuesday. North Dakota already has a law prohibiting same-sex marriage. Measure 1 would add two sentences to the North Dakota Constitution: "Marriage consists only of the legal union between a man and a woman. No other domestic union, however denominated, may be recognized as a marriage, or given the same or substantially equivalent legal effect."
Ohio Ohio's governor and two US senators -- all of them Republicans who back Bush -- have opposed the referendum because of the restriction on civil unions. That section says: "This state and its political subdivisions shall not create or recognize a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance, or effect of marriage."
Oklahoma " A. Marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman. Neither this Constitution nor any other provision of law shall be construed to require that marital status or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups.

B. A marriage between persons of the same gender performed in another state shall not be recognized as valid and binding in this state as of the date of the marriage.

C. Any person knowingly issuing a marriage license in violation of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor."
Oregon "It is the policy of Oregon and its political subdivisions, that only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or legally recognized as a marriage."
Utah Amendment 3 reads, "No other domestic union, however denominated, may be recognized as a marriage or given the same or substantially equivalent legal effect."
Virginia An Act to amend the Code of Virginia by adding a section numbered 20-45.3, relating to the Affirmation of Marriage Act for the Commonwealth of Virginia. [H 751] Approved April 21, 2004

A civil union, partnership contract or other arrangement between persons of the same sex purporting to bestow the privileges or obligations of marriage is prohibited. Any such civil union, partnership contract or other arrangement entered into by persons of the same sex in another state or jurisdiction shall be void in all respects in Virginia and any contractual rights created thereby shall be void and unenforceable.
Virginia PART II Here's an additional amendment (House Joint Resolution No. 528) as of October 2004:
"To be valid or recognized in this Commonwealth, a marriage may exist only between one man and one woman. No provision of this Constitution shall be interpreted to require the Commonwealth to recognize or permit marriage between individuals of the same sex.